Showing posts with label intellectual capacity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label intellectual capacity. Show all posts

Sunday, November 16, 2008

You're Smarter Than You Think: Part 2

In The Beginning
The first conspicuous opportunity for us to learn starts at birth. Never again does learning happen at such an accelerated pace than in the first few months when a newborn begins to uncover the world through the perceptive stimuli of his or her environment. While developing the senses of sight, taste, smell, hearing and touch, the newborn begins to learn how to consciously interact with this environment beyond the subconscious brilliance inherited through the parental genetic fingerprint.

Baby in Hand by Aldo Risolvo

According to Dr. Robert Titzer, a California-based infant researcher "[t]he natural window of opportunity to learn opens at birth and begins to close at the age of four." In an article written by Matthew Coutts, Dr. Titzer recommends to parents that they should be reading to their babies by the time they are 3 months old (article).

Unfortunately, the National Post article overshoots the purpose of the early-reading recommendation. It's not meant to mold the baby into a child prodigy; it's to give the child a good start to life the same way that a parent focuses on good post-natal nutrition. A newborn is a sponge for the knowledge that their surroundings offer and they will learn considerably more from a used children's book than they will from a Baby Einstein DVD. Unlike the DVD, the book allows the child to interact directly with the learning tool at his or her own pace. Furthermore, the action of reading helps strengthen the communication bond between parent and child in a way that the unilateral television-based visual tool will not do. An increasing number of studies directly link television to decreased learning ability in addition to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other learning disabilities. The challenge for most parents is finding the time to read because television is a very effective distractor for babies thus freeing up time in a busy parent's life. This also implies that the parent needs to significantly reduce and ideally eliminate the hours he or she spends watching television, which is by no means an easy lifestyle change to make. There are some who believe that television is exploited by the elite and wealthy as a means to keep people from moving up into higher socioeconomic classes in a globalized world where the opportunity to learn and gain knowledge is so widely accessible. Proponents of this theory note that many highly educated parents do not let their children watch any television at all. Literacy rate is a strong indicator of economic wealth and while even the poorest neighbourhoods in the United States now have television, they also have alarmingly low functional literacy rates. This digression to the connection between television, literacy and socioeconomic wealth is another topic in itself.

Taking a step back to when a newborn first opens his or her eyes, this moment is the only time in a person's life when intellectual capacity exists in a way that is effectively unaltered by the external environment. Psychologist Cyril Burt termed this intellectual capacity 'innate general cognitive ability'. It is essentially the genetically inherited capacity to gain intelligence. Unfortunately, we have no way to measure this quantity and thus there is no way to determine how smart one can realistically become. What really matters though, is that babies are nurtured to make optimum use of the available learning channels.

Coming up in my next post, I will define the 'smart' adjective in 'You're Smarter Than You Think.'

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

You're Smarter Than You Think: Part 1

In my June post, I predicted why Barack Obama would be the 44th president of the United States, and at the end of that post, I said that I would discuss his flaws and strengths in detail in a later post. In the spirit of political rhetoric, I will 'refine' this promise: such a posting will be indefinitely suspended due to the over saturation of media coverage on the subject of Barack Obama.

The McCain 'straight-talk express' translation: I don't think anyone needs or wants to hear any more about Barack Obama right now. Anyone wanting to know more about him, his ideals or his policies can (and will) consult the multitude of media on the subject including--but not limited to--the two books he has authored.



photo by allieTM

Introduction

So instead of talking about Obama, I will use the former Vice Presidential candidates as an introduction to my next topic, a series of posts I call "You're Smarter Than You Think".

Contrary to popular belief, Sarah Palin is not unintelligent. Clearly she has not spent an inordinate amount of time studying political science. For example, she could not name any supreme court decisions other than Roe versus Wade (nor can I, but both of us could learn). Lack of political knowledge could make a legitimate case that Palin was not quite ready to assume the role of vice president, but it says little about her raw intelligence. Her former counterpart, Vice President-elect Joe Biden, has become an expert at giving the public the illusion of political knowledge. He certainly does have political knowledge, but the number of times he misspeaks is quite worrisome if one assumes he makes policy decisions based on this flawed knowledge. In some university and college multiple choice tests, the examinee is penalized marks for incorrect answers. In such a test, I'm not sure Joeseph Biden would score any higher than Sarah Palin on the political science front. It's really quite amazing how many of these smart-sounding people get themselves into positions of responsibility. They make themselves sound smart to create the illusion that the are smart. They often find themselves saying that they are smart, perhaps because they are compensating for their fear that they are not smart enough. The "You're Smarter Than You Think" series is not intended for these types of people who think they are smarter than they are. It is intended for those who underestimate their capability and never reach their full potential as a result.

I was able to predict the winner of the election because of the poor fundamentals of the economy in addition to the low voter confidence in the incumbent party and not because I'm smarter than anyone else. Most people that know me are aware that I'm terrible at remembering names and birthdays, I can't solve a Rubik's cube, I'm not even 'smarter than a 5th grader', let alone a Jeopardy contestant. These facts should not limit myself (or anyone else) from doing anything I want to do in order to be successful. Knowledge is often misunderstood for intellectual capacity. The next series of posts will build on the story of why you very well could be smarter than you think.