Showing posts with label Federal Reserve. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Federal Reserve. Show all posts

Sunday, May 10, 2009

The Inflation Tease

The principle of inflation in economics is actually not much different than the principle of inflation in physics. When a balloon is inflated with hot air, for example, we see a very large increase in volume without any appreciable increase in mass. Similarly, in economics, inflation represents an increase in monetary supply without the corresponding increase in the value of that money. It looks like growth at first, but like a Ponzi scheme, it’s only a matter of time before the bubble pops and a correction occurs and everyone sees what’s really there; thin air.


There is no perfect way to measure inflation, but many different indicators exist. The most commonly accepted indicator is the Consumer Price Index (CPI); a sampling of the prices of the most commonly is purchased consumable goods. Using this indicator of inflation, the CPI chart indicates a step change in slope around 1971, the year the gold-based Bretton Woods system was officially abandoned because it was preventing government from running large deficits. The average annual increase in CPI jumped to a 4.6% average annual rate of increase from a more stable 2.5%.


The cause of inflation is a significant increase in money supply. Imagine playing a game of Monopoly where the bank decides to add a zero to the end of every new note it issues. Pretty soon, the old money becomes useless and each player would be forced to raise the selling price of his or her properties to reflect this new reality. It wouldn’t be so bad if we just added a zero to the end of every note, but the way it happens usually benefits some people quite a bit more than others. The first person to pass ‘Go’, for example, would find themselves flush with cash, and would likely go out on a spending spree. By the time the player in ‘Jail’ realizes what’s going on, he will probably have sold off all of this properties for what he thought was a great price, when in fact he got ripped off. This is exactly what happens in the real world, the first people to get the increase in money supply—the large financial institutions, hedge funds, very wealthy and so on, get to spend the new money at old prices. By the time this money gets into the pockets of the middle class and the poor, prices have already increased and they simply find that their savings have been rendered worthless. This is exactly what we are seeing today—wage depreciation occurring at the same time that consumer prices are either increasing or staying flat.

It’s no surprise that central banks such as the United States Federal Reserve, a pseudo-private, pseudo-public entity which is essentially run by banks and backed by government, makes their policy that creates the biggest benefit to their friends at large financial institutions. Government, which essentially owns (but does not directly operate) the central bank, is usually complacent to this policy because inflated economies look good—at least until the bubble bursts. And yet no president including Regan has been able to successfully balance recessionary and inflationary forces since the idea of having a naturally stable currency was abandoned in 1971. This is the main argument for why central banks should be abandoned—government has proven itself incapable of maintaining a stable currency in nearly four decades since it decided it could do a better job of this than free markets could.
"I'll bet you a lot more than a penny" - Peter Schiff predicting the credit crisis and collapse of the purchasing power of the USD (2006).

This reality is often underreported by the mainstream American media. Some claim this is because the media, including many so-called experts and economists, are mislead by the way the government reports on it's monetary policy. For example, the U.S. Federal Reserve decided to stop reporting M3, the total money supply in March of 2006, claiming the data was too difficult to accurately compile. It still reports M2, which is part of the money supply, but the M3 wedge has grown from less than 5% in 1971 to over 30% of the total in February 2006 when this figure was last reported (see chart). Not everyone is fooled though. The video below shows economist Peter Schiff on major U.S. television networks predicting the subprime and credit crises in 2006 and 2007 despite being ridiculed by his naive counterparts at the time. It is also worth noting that these counterparts recommended buying equity stake in firms like Bear Sterns, Merrill Lynch and Washington Mutual, all of which became insolvent and were forced into distressed mergers with more solvent financial institutions. Each of these transactions was facilitated by either the Federal Reserve or the Treasury with some kind of taxpayer-backed debt guarantee or subsidy. Hopefully these guys stay low-key for awhile until people forget how bad their recommendations really were. Enjoy watching the video.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Fed buys AIG (courtesy: the American Taxpayer)

I was watching the news today. A headline topic was the proven link between elevated levels of Biphenol A (BPA) in the urine of the adults studied, and an elevated risk of heart disease and type-2 diabetes (full story). An expert on the show noted that the link was not a chemical one and the exact source of BPA in those tested was not determined by the study. It basically proves that we should avoid ingesting BPA (which we already knew). He recommended consumers minimize drinking from polycarbonate bottles and eating from PC-lined food cans. PC is the very hard plastic used in Naglene bottles. As a rule of thumb, if it isn't hard, it probably isn't PC (look for the number 7 or the label 'PC' in the recycling triangle).

Now for the funny part:
As he said this, images of margarine containers, disposable plastic water bottles and other soft plastic food containers were shown. None of the containers shown were BPA-bearing plastics. In plastics, BPA is only used to manufacture polycarbonate (PC) and as an antioxidant in polyvinylchloride (PVC). The products that were shown are made from polyethylene terephthalate, low/high-density polyethylene, polypropylene and polystyrene (PETE, LDPE, HDPE, PP and PS respectively). Other than PVC, which is not generally used in food/drink items, and PC, none of the other plastics are manufactured using BPA!



In other news..


[Image courtesy of Clarke]


In exchange for up to $85 million in federal loans, the U.S. government will receive a 79.9 percent equity stake in the company.

According to the press release,
"The Board determined that, in current circumstances, a disorderly failure of AIG could add to already significant levels of financial market fragility and lead to substantially higher borrowing costs, reduced household wealth, and materially weaker economic performance."
Instead of a disorderly failure, this announcement ensures and orderly failure as the company's assets are slowly liquidated until the loan is repaid. Extremely large free market equities have now received full or partial bailouts from the U.S. Treasury (Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae's saviour), The U.S. Federal Reserve (AIG's saviour), and soon U.S. Congress (General Motors' saviour).

To be precise, Freddie and Fannie were not explicitly free market enterprises. Instead, they were implicitly guaranteed companies otherwise known as GSE's (Government Sponsored Enterprises). This was their fundamental flaw. Investors said they were taught in 'investing school' (whatever that is) that theoretically speaking, the entities had the risk of treasuries but the reward of equities. If that sounds too good to be true, that's because it is and always was. While others share the blame, this structural flaw took the lead in granting so many irresponsible sub-prime loans and now results in a cascading effect we are seeing in financial markets around the world.

All this is meant as a primer for my next topic: The Swinging Pendulum--and while change is good, the swinging pendulum is decidedly not a good thing.