Many financial advisers continue their rhetoric about a pending recovery of the U.S. economy, as it 'always does'. As mentioned in earlier posts, the U.S. economy is structured on cheap oil, which despite the crisis, still does not exist right now. In USD terms, oil is still more expensive than it was a year ago. Either the financial advisers don't get it, or they are lying the way Enron executives lied to their shareholders while funnelling their money out the back door. I suspect it is the former. Following weeks of market turmoil, record low auto sales and continuing record high oil prices, Citigroup finally began recommending to investors to sell shares in GM and Ford this week after their shares fell 82% and 67% in the last year. At least they made their statement sound eloquent:
"[W]e believe the risk-reward balance [on automaker stocks] has tilted decidedly negative on both absolute value and relative value versus underperforming suppliers," -Citigroup investment note.Thanks Citi for the timely advice. Neither Ford nor GM has had a profitable automotive division in over 6 years. Better late than never I suppose.
Many had hoped that swift approval of the bailout plan would restore confidence in the U.S economy. Such an effect has yet to be seen as even the hopeful are growing skeptical. Hank Paulson said it will not prevent all bank failures--which are likely to resume their course now that the short selling ban has ended. Violent and sometimes even more damaging aftershocks continue to ripple worldwide as the USD is still the most widely held currency. The only stable asset right now is gold (it appears moderately unstable because of the gyrations of the currencies in which it is valued). Few signs of a bottom can be seen yet and confidence continues to slide.
Anyone who has been overseas recently knows that the once universal US dollar began to fall out of favour by merchants for other currencies over a decade ago. Unfortunately most Americans have never been overseas and don't even understand what is happening with their 401k's. Even the presidential candidates appear naive (or perhaps it is merely election rhetoric). They appear to think that they can solve the 'crisis' by investing in the economy (cutting taxes, fixing health care, energy independence spending, gas tax holidays, and so on). Unfortunately, it's probably too late for that, as they don't have any more pre-approved credit to invest. They would have to borrow it from foreign investors (or print it and make the USD worthless). The flaw that proved fatal for many of the failed institutions was the assumption that they could always raise more capital, if required.
House prices will always go up, storied institutions can always raise debt, and foreign investors will always buy up U.S. treasuries. The first two cards have already fallen. With foreign investors fleeing, the U.S. government needs to prove to its lenders that it will not default and is serious about paying back its debt rather than running deficits indefinitely. Serious action could take the form of pulling out of Iraq as quickly as humanly possible--this would likely split the country in three and destabilize the region, but the U.S. economy is pretty unstable itself if anyone hasn't already noticed; furthermore, as Alan Greenspan notes, Iraqi oil production has only now recovered to pre-war levels, so staying longer is unlikely to result in significant cheap oil supply anytime soon. It would also be wise to pull out of Afghanistan as soon as possible and negotiate a deal with the Taliban--this may not be in line with offical public policy; but as John McCain said, unofficial policy is often quite different from public policy. Most importantly, they need to sit down with the leaders of economic powerhouses and negotiate a set of terms to repay their debt and stabalize confidence. The first two cards have already fallen, if the third were to fall, it would get ugly. Barack Obama talks about hope and change. Let's all hope someone understands the severity of the problem and is willing to make the change required to avert a catastrophe.
4 comments:
Anyone with common sense should know better than to invest in an automaker, particularly a North American one. I would hope that said financial adviser filled out a 'Know Your Client' form and both parties were aware of the risk involved!
GM is betting its future on the Chevy Volt. It hopes start selling them in 2010 (the battery is not safe yet). It's selling price target is below cost at $30-40k apiece. It hopes to sell 100,000 units/year in the first few years (about the same as the Prius). Market conditions are decidedly difficult. Ford is in a slightly less awful position.
The only good news: they got a bridge loan from u.s. congress if that's enough to keep them afloat.
Good article Kent (I hope that the globe and mail are paying you for this shit). Do you think we're headed for a 1929 depression again or what? How low will TLM shares get. My thoughts is that the worst is not yet over and we coudl see as low as $8/share. It can't possible get lower than this; TLM is too diverse a company and unlike the automakers actually makes profit. The quesiton is, when will TLM recover and get back to $25/share. One year? Three years? Cheers. James
I'm not sure that we're headed back to soup lines, but my biggest concern is political instability. History has shown how difficult it is to maintain peace in poor economic countries and times.
I can't make a prediction about prices of anything until volatility comes under control. An economic bubble has burst and a new equilibrium will be reached whether that is higher or lower than today. The only thing for sure is that demand for oil will continue to outstrip supply although I suspect price weakness may accelerate and persist longer than previously expected.
Post a Comment